|
|
|
|
Bulbar urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts placed on the ventral, dorsal or lateral surface of the urethra: are results affected by the surgical technique?
uretra, stenosi uretrale
Barbagli G, Palminteri
E, Guazzoni G, Montorsi F, Turini D, Lazzeri M. Bulbar urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts
placed on the ventral, dorsal or lateral surface of the urethra: are results
affected by the surgical technique? J Urol.
2005 Sep;174(3):955-7;
PURPOSE:
The use of buccal mucosa graft onlay urethroplasty represents the most
widespread method of bulbar urethral stricture repair. The graft may be placed
on the ventral or dorsal urethral surface according to surgeon experience and
preference. We investigated whether the results are affected by the surgical
technique by comparing the outcome of 3 types of bulbar urethroplasty using
buccal mucosa graft.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We repaired 50 bulbar urethral
strictures with buccal mucosa grafts from 1997 to 2002. Mean patient age was 42
years. The etiology of stricture was ischemia in 12 cases, trauma in 6,
instrumentation in 4 and unknown in 28. Patients with lichen sclerosus, failed
hypospadias or urethroplasty and stricture extending into the penile urethra
were not included. A total of 47 patients (94%) had undergone previous urethrotomy
or dilation. The buccal mucosa graft was always harvested from the cheek using
a 2 team approach. Mean graft length was 4.2 cm. The graft was placed on the ventral,
dorsal and lateral bulbar urethral surface in 17, 27 and 6 cases, respectively.
Clinical outcome was considered a success or failure at the time that any
postoperative procedure was needed, including dilation. Mean followup was 42
months (range 12 to 76).
RESULTS: Of 50 cases 42 (84%) were successful and 8
(16%) failed. The 17 ventral grafts provided success in 14 cases (83%) and
failure in 3 (17%). The 27 dorsal grafts provided success in 23 cases (85%) and
failure in 4 (15%). The 6 lateral grafts provided success in 5 cases (83%) and
failure in 1 (17%). No surgical complications were observed. Failures involved
the anastomotic site (distal in 2 and proximal in 3) and the whole grafted area
in 3 cases. They were treated with urethrotomy in 5 cases and 2-stage
urethroplasty in 3.
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience the placement of buccal mucosa
grafts into the ventral, dorsal or lateral surface of the bulbar urethra showed
the same success rates (83% to 85%) and the outcome was not affected by the
surgical technique. Moreover, stricture recurrence was uniformly distributed in
all patients.
|
|